<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: xkcd and the shhing librarians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mazar.ca/2007/06/22/tea-leaves-of-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2007/06/22/tea-leaves-of-information/</link>
	<description>News from the Trenches of Librarianship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mirrors of Ourselves : Part One &#171; The Fifth Law</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2007/06/22/tea-leaves-of-information/comment-page-1/#comment-89532</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirrors of Ourselves : Part One &#171; The Fifth Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2007/06/22/tea-leaves-of-information/#comment-89532</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;xkcd and the shhing librarian&#8221; from Diary of a Subversive Librarian. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;xkcd and the shhing librarian&#8221; from Diary of a Subversive Librarian. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2007/06/22/tea-leaves-of-information/comment-page-1/#comment-79145</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2007/06/22/tea-leaves-of-information/#comment-79145</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree with you. Actually I was about to post a link ot your post and just say, &quot;what she said&quot;, but then I went off an a tangent. Even when I describe something that might be &quot;what librarians do/are&quot;, I automatically exclude myself (I don&#039;t have a collection and don&#039;t do reference!). Tricksy. Great post, though. Fantastic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree with you. Actually I was about to post a link ot your post and just say, &#8220;what she said&#8221;, but then I went off an a tangent. Even when I describe something that might be &#8220;what librarians do/are&#8221;, I automatically exclude myself (I don&#8217;t have a collection and don&#8217;t do reference!). Tricksy. Great post, though. Fantastic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen (LibraryNation)</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2007/06/22/tea-leaves-of-information/comment-page-1/#comment-79142</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen (LibraryNation)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2007/06/22/tea-leaves-of-information/#comment-79142</guid>
		<description>Well, I wouldn&#039;t exactly say I&#039;m okay with the perpetuation of the librarian stereotype... I just feel that we can change the myth better through &lt;i&gt;showing&lt;/i&gt; what else we are by increasing usage (and thereby the visibility of what real librarians do) rather than just defensively saying &quot;that label doesn&#039;t apply to me&quot;

I definitely agree with you though - we do need to get a better grasp on what it is we exactly &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; so we can explain it when asked...but perhaps this is a more difficult problem, because there are so many different types that we&#039;re hard-pressed to lump everything that each of us does under the heading &quot;librarian&quot; - catalogers, reference librarians, youth librarians, readers advisers, technology librarians, information literacy librarians, academic librarians in a specialized field, medical librarians, legal librarians ...and on and on. Can we come up with a single list that says &quot;this is what constitutes Librarian?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I wouldn&#8217;t exactly say I&#8217;m okay with the perpetuation of the librarian stereotype&#8230; I just feel that we can change the myth better through <i>showing</i> what else we are by increasing usage (and thereby the visibility of what real librarians do) rather than just defensively saying &#8220;that label doesn&#8217;t apply to me&#8221;</p>
<p>I definitely agree with you though &#8211; we do need to get a better grasp on what it is we exactly <i>do</i> so we can explain it when asked&#8230;but perhaps this is a more difficult problem, because there are so many different types that we&#8217;re hard-pressed to lump everything that each of us does under the heading &#8220;librarian&#8221; &#8211; catalogers, reference librarians, youth librarians, readers advisers, technology librarians, information literacy librarians, academic librarians in a specialized field, medical librarians, legal librarians &#8230;and on and on. Can we come up with a single list that says &#8220;this is what constitutes Librarian?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: June</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2007/06/22/tea-leaves-of-information/comment-page-1/#comment-79066</link>
		<dc:creator>June</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2007/06/22/tea-leaves-of-information/#comment-79066</guid>
		<description>And on the other end of the scale, I&#039;m not a librarian, but hurting a book &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; torture to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And on the other end of the scale, I&#8217;m not a librarian, but hurting a book <em>is</em> torture to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
