<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carolyn Parrish doesn&#8217;t Care about Blog People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/</link>
	<description>News from the Trenches of Librarianship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I have discovered that the most intolerant people I have ever met are those on the &quot;left&quot;. Their inability to consider anything outside of their worldview is appalling. Well, at least, a pure unadulterated democratic who firmly embraces all of the ideals of a parliamentary democracy is now vying for her seat in Mississauga. /sarcasm off
&lt;br /&gt;
[&lt;i&gt;Intolerant of what, exactly? The right&#039;s desire to take rights away from gay people? The rights of religious people to discriminate against those they think their God frowns upon? How does the left enter into this conversation at all? Carolyn Parrish is a Liberal, not a New Democrat. And apparently I&#039;m a tolerant leftist; leaving these comments on my blog means I cam mock them more fully. R.M.&lt;/i&gt;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have discovered that the most intolerant people I have ever met are those on the &#8220;left&#8221;. Their inability to consider anything outside of their worldview is appalling. Well, at least, a pure unadulterated democratic who firmly embraces all of the ideals of a parliamentary democracy is now vying for her seat in Mississauga. /sarcasm off<br />
<br />
[<i>Intolerant of what, exactly? The right's desire to take rights away from gay people? The rights of religious people to discriminate against those they think their God frowns upon? How does the left enter into this conversation at all? Carolyn Parrish is a Liberal, not a New Democrat. And apparently I'm a tolerant leftist; leaving these comments on my blog means I cam mock them more fully. R.M.</i>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silent Running &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Podcast assaults Christmas, insults pretty much everyone&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Silent Running &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Podcast assaults Christmas, insults pretty much everyone&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 09:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] Did a Canadian political candidate, upon winning the Liberal Party nomination to be the candidate for a seat in Parliament, exclaim in joy &#8220;Islam wins!&#8221;? The answer appears to be&#8230;no. Kathy Shaidle shows other bloggers how fact-checking is done with her response to the unfolding story over who said what; Random Access Mazar analyses the reaction of MP Carolyn Parrish to the discovery that there are things called blogs and people can actually use them to say what they like about her and the Canadian government can&#8217;t actually have them sent to re-education camps; and Small Dead Animals has a funny story about Paul Martin, difficult to believe though that is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Did a Canadian political candidate, upon winning the Liberal Party nomination to be the candidate for a seat in Parliament, exclaim in joy &#8220;Islam wins!&#8221;? The answer appears to be&#8230;no. Kathy Shaidle shows other bloggers how fact-checking is done with her response to the unfolding story over who said what; Random Access Mazar analyses the reaction of MP Carolyn Parrish to the discovery that there are things called blogs and people can actually use them to say what they like about her and the Canadian government can&#8217;t actually have them sent to re-education camps; and Small Dead Animals has a funny story about Paul Martin, difficult to believe though that is. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>I have a low, very very low opinion of Carolyn Parrish who described Americans as bastards (including my children and grandchildren). I have a much lower opinion of Jean Chretien not flinging her out of the caucus because her ignorant, self-serving anti-Americanism served his creepy brand of anti-American politics. 

I heard her on the Current and will not listen to her again. She has taken Canadian political discourse down several notches. I feel shamed by her antics - so sue me!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;[Yes,  I&#039;m quite sure Carolyn Parrish was specifically thinking of your grandchildren when she made her comments about the American administration. Points to you for finding a way to take it personally! R.M.]&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a low, very very low opinion of Carolyn Parrish who described Americans as bastards (including my children and grandchildren). I have a much lower opinion of Jean Chretien not flinging her out of the caucus because her ignorant, self-serving anti-Americanism served his creepy brand of anti-American politics. </p>
<p>I heard her on the Current and will not listen to her again. She has taken Canadian political discourse down several notches. I feel shamed by her antics &#8211; so sue me!<br />
<br />
<i>[Yes,  I'm quite sure Carolyn Parrish was specifically thinking of your grandchildren when she made her comments about the American administration. Points to you for finding a way to take it personally! R.M.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Carolyn Parrish is so typical of &quot;Entitlement&quot; Liberal politicians I am suprised that Paul Martin has not taken her back into the party.  Perhaps she will be getting a job with CSL as a fog horn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carolyn Parrish is so typical of &#8220;Entitlement&#8221; Liberal politicians I am suprised that Paul Martin has not taken her back into the party.  Perhaps she will be getting a job with CSL as a fog horn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul M. Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul M. Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/#comment-183</guid>
		<description>I guess she misses the Action of being a Back Bencher with NO Hope of voting for what the people in the riding want.She&#039;s gone,out of the limelight and may have to GET A JOB like the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess she misses the Action of being a Back Bencher with NO Hope of voting for what the people in the riding want.She&#8217;s gone,out of the limelight and may have to GET A JOB like the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>So here you have irrefutable evidence that Parrish is shallow and egotistical (as many of us previously suspected) and a danger to the Canadian system of government. She does first and foremost what is in her personal best interest.  If that is what you want in power, then please vote her in again.  We all have a choice.  You lefties rant about &quot;change&quot; being inevitable, but you embrace change only when it means sticking a finger in the eye of laws and customs of Western civilization.  How about embracing some change in government &quot;for a change.&quot;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;[Interesting how you manage to be so righteous about someone you clearly don&#039;t know much about...Carolyn Parrish isn&#039;t even running in this election. We lefties like to at least know something about what we&#039;re talking about before we deign to comment on a stranger&#039;s blog. And yes, I find so much personal joy in sticking a finger in the eye of those sacred laws and customs. So much joy, I don&#039;t know where to begin. Thank God group sex is now legal in Canada; now I have something to do this afternoon before my traditional christmas celebrations. R.M.]&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here you have irrefutable evidence that Parrish is shallow and egotistical (as many of us previously suspected) and a danger to the Canadian system of government. She does first and foremost what is in her personal best interest.  If that is what you want in power, then please vote her in again.  We all have a choice.  You lefties rant about &#8220;change&#8221; being inevitable, but you embrace change only when it means sticking a finger in the eye of laws and customs of Western civilization.  How about embracing some change in government &#8220;for a change.&#8221;<br />
<br />
<i>[Interesting how you manage to be so righteous about someone you clearly don't know much about...Carolyn Parrish isn't even running in this election. We lefties like to at least know something about what we're talking about before we deign to comment on a stranger's blog. And yes, I find so much personal joy in sticking a finger in the eye of those sacred laws and customs. So much joy, I don't know where to begin. Thank God group sex is now legal in Canada; now I have something to do this afternoon before my traditional christmas celebrations. R.M.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: small dead animals</title>
		<link>http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>small dead animals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mazar.ca/2005/12/23/carolyn-parish-doesnt-care-about-blog-people/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New Market For Carolyn Parrish Action Dolls&lt;/strong&gt;

Canada&#039;s foremost defender of speaking Doc Martens* to Power, paraphrased; &quot;gosh darn how can we get those darn bloggers to stop? Wave a magic wand mr. legal expert; how can we stop the blogs? My reputation is so important, mr....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New Market For Carolyn Parrish Action Dolls</strong></p>
<p>Canada&#8217;s foremost defender of speaking Doc Martens* to Power, paraphrased; &#8220;gosh darn how can we get those darn bloggers to stop? Wave a magic wand mr. legal expert; how can we stop the blogs? My reputation is so important, mr&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
